Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-5.4 nano

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 55.7 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-5.4 nano specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.341.9
Released—2026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.25
Results tracked1640

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Coding10341405
SciCode—46.9%
WeirdML—49.2%
ALE-Bench—1,005
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Hard Prompts10051381
ARC-AGI-2—5.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—39.7%
ARC-AGI-1—51.5%
CritPt—9.3%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—36.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.81
ForecastBench—57.3

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Math10471406
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—87.8%
ProofBench—5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—25.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Expert9701396
GPQA Diamond—78.5%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Vision—1196

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Non-English9881359
LMArena Chinese10121392
LMArena German9441367
LMArena Korean8991320
LMArena Russian9901363
LMArena French—1396
LMArena Japanese—1343
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Instruction Following9921362

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Longer Query10031366

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Text10221372
LMArena Creative Writing9981314
LMArena Multi-Turn9591382

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-5.4 nano share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper