Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-4.5 specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.337.2
Released—2025-02-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1642

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Coding10341396
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
WeirdML—39.4%
LiveBench Coding—75.2%
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10051403
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.74
ForecastBench—61.7
LiveBench—69%

Math GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Math10471412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
MATH Level 5—78.6%

Knowledge GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Expert9701394
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English9881413
LMArena Chinese10121421
LMArena German9441457
LMArena Korean8991392
LMArena Russian9901419
LMArena French—1418
LMArena Japanese—1416

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following9921404
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Longer Query10031406
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-4.5
LMArena Text10221417
LMArena Creative Writing9981394
LMArena Multi-Turn9591444
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-4.5?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-4.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper