Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.7

Rank #160 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 53.1 to 48.5.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 specifications
Gemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index37.739.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Coding12551339

Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Hard Prompts12481335

Math Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Math12721318

Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Expert12151308

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Vision—1186

Multilingual Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Non-English12741313
LMArena Chinese12741380
LMArena German12751314
LMArena Russian12831327
LMArena French1307—
LMArena Japanese1242—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1242—

Instruction Following Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Instruction Following12531310

Long Context Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Longer Query12531348

Writing & Preference Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Text12791336
LMArena Creative Writing12841307
LMArena Multi-Turn12691340

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper