Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 33.3.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1440 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 36.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.