Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 33.3.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 42.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1400 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |
Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1392 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1379 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1389 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1390 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.