Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 33.3.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1305 |
Long Context Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3 32B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.