Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3 14B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 24.6 to 18.5.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3 14B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 37.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.