Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 12.6.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 36.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.