Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen Max
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Max in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1269 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1262 |
Long Context Qwen Max leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen Max?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.