Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.7 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 42.6 to 38.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1291 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1272 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1295 |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1247 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.7 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.