Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1322 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1308 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1299 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.