Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Gemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.739.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12551347

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12481322

Math Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12721305

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert12151308

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12741275
LMArena Chinese12741304
LMArena French13071328
LMArena German12751282
LMArena Korean12321206
LMArena Russian12831268
LMArena Spanish12421336
LMArena Japanese1242—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12531299

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12531312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12791311
LMArena Creative Writing12841264
LMArena Multi-Turn12691309

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper