Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs MiniMax-M2.1

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 48.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514 and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
Gemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index37.738.9
Released—2025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Coding12551421
LMArena WebDev—1384
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%

Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12481411
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Math12721397

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Expert12151431
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English12741378
LMArena Chinese12741430
LMArena French13071404
LMArena German12751381
LMArena Japanese12421287
LMArena Korean12321298
LMArena Russian12831387
LMArena Spanish12421397

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following12531400

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query12531416

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text12791392
LMArena Creative Writing12841361
LMArena Multi-Turn12691396

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper