Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 48.5.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.