Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.