Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 35.5.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 52.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.