Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

GLM-5.2 Z.ai (Zhipu)

51.1

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.2 leads 57.1 to 33.3.
  • GLM-5.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index37.751.1
Released—2026-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), GLM-5.2: 51.3 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Coding12551485
SWE-bench Verified—78.7%
DeepSWE—43.8%
FrontierCode—24.5%
LMArena WebDev—1603
SciCode—50.5%
WeirdML—70.1%
ALE-Bench—1,047

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, GLM-5.2: 32.4 (#63)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
APEX-Agents—45.2%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—31.7%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—8,314

Reasoning GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), GLM-5.2: 42.3 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12481480
ARC-AGI-2—22.8%
SimpleBench—58.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.3%
ARC-AGI-1—77%
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles—21%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—93.6%
LMCA—45.8%
Surface Evolver Bench—55.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.78

Math GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), GLM-5.2: 55.7 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Math12721482
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—59.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.4%
ProofBench—35%

Knowledge GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), GLM-5.2: 57.1 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Expert12151486
GPQA Diamond—91.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34.2%

Multilingual GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), GLM-5.2: 55.8 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Non-English12741459
LMArena Chinese12741519
LMArena French13071479
LMArena German12751468
LMArena Japanese12421451
LMArena Korean12321445
LMArena Russian12831466
LMArena Spanish12421477

Instruction Following GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), GLM-5.2: 76.9 (#34)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Instruction Following12531465

Long Context GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), GLM-5.2: 45.3 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Longer Query12531479

Writing & Preference GLM-5.2 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), GLM-5.2: 70.4 (#21)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.2
LMArena Text12791470
LMArena Creative Writing12841462
LMArena Multi-Turn12691469
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1757
EQ-Bench 4—1222

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or GLM-5.2 better for coding?

GLM-5.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and GLM-5.2 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.2 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper