Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs StarCoder 2 3B
Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 62.0 to 33.5.
- StarCoder 2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-02-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), StarCoder 2 3B: 33.5
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 21.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 27.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 88.76 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 21.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 34.2% |
| MMLU | — | 36.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than StarCoder 2 3B?
Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and StarCoder 2 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.