Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 49.6.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.542.9
Released2026-09-302026-02-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked2115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—
LMArena Coding1550—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 213,7180.54
APEX-Agents82.2%—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
CritPt27.1%—
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper