Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 37.4.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.542.5
Released2026-09-302026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena WebDev16781244
LMArena Coding15501412
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 213,718462.69
APEX-Agents82.2%—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts15481403
CritPt27.1%—
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.98

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Math15361407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
ProofBench99%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Expert15531407
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English15231385
LMArena Chinese16101446
LMArena Russian15371379
LMArena Spanish14971400
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1368
LMArena Korean—1344

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following15381374

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query15491392

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text15341397
LMArena Creative Writing15311343
LMArena Multi-Turn15571393

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper