Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.5 27B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 38.8.
- Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 41.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1358 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1427 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.5 27B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | 201.98 |
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1414 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1429 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1428 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1241 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1478 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1407 |
| LMArena French | — | 1410 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1393 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1410 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.5 27B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5 27B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.