Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 0.9% for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.542.1
Released2026-09-302026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked2127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena WebDev16781360
SciCode61.8%35.6%
LMArena Coding15501436
FrontierSWE55%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
CritPt27.1%0.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts15481421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math15361432
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Expert15531432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%

Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English15231400
LMArena Chinese16101462
LMArena Russian15371400
LMArena Spanish14971424
LMArena French—1442
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1367
LMArena Korean—1352

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following15381399

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query15491410

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text15341417
LMArena Creative Writing15311368
LMArena Multi-Turn15571416

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper