Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3 32B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 0.3% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 61.8% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3 32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1311 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1305 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3 32B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 32B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.