Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 18.6.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.