Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 36.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1272 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1305 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1295 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1289 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1247 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.