Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 44.2 to 10.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.