Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax-M2

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 37.3.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index56.537.4
Released2026-09-302025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena WebDev16781297
LMArena Coding15501370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
Vending-Bench 213,718160.6
Terminal-Bench—30%
APEX-Agents82.2%—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts15481357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%
CritPt27.1%—

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math15361352
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert15531337

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), MiniMax-M2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English15231313
LMArena Chinese16101366
LMArena Russian15371331
LMArena Spanish14971326
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following15381328

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query15491331

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text15341340
LMArena Creative Writing15311286
LMArena Multi-Turn15571361

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiniMax-M2?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper