Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 33.0.
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1186 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1145 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1152 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1142 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1099 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1145 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1092 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1131 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1162 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.