Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-4.6V
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 62.0 to 40.9.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-12-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), GLM-4.6V: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1368 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), GLM-4.6V: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1371 |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1340 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1352 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1360 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-4.6V?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-4.6V better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-4.6V share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.