Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-4.5
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.5 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.0.
- GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 42.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-07-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), GLM-4.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1429 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1427 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1433 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), GLM-4.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1414 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1454 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1404 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1412 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1395 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1415 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-4.5?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-4.5 better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-4.5 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.