Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 2B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 71.4 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1010 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 989 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 94.2 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1009 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 937 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 970 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 981 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Gemma 2B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 2B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.