Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 71.4 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 1.1 2b IT specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index56.529.3
Released2026-09-30—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Coding15501034
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—
HumanEval+—17.7%
MBPP+—23.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts15481005
CritPt27.1%—

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Math15361047
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Expert1553970

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Non-English1523988
LMArena Chinese16101012
LMArena Russian1537990
LMArena German—944
LMArena Korean—899
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following1538992

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query15491003

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Text15341022
LMArena Creative Writing1531998
LMArena Multi-Turn1557959

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper