Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs o1
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and o1 in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 52.5 to 27.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is VPCT: 91% for Gemini 3 Pro and 37% for o1.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Pro | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 54.7 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2025-11-18 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 67 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 52.1 (#33), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 69.9% | 47.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1482 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.9% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 74.2% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.7% | — |
| GSO | 18.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,177 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.83 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 40.5 (#21), o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 71% | 51.1% |
| Terminal-Bench | 69.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.5% | — |
| GDPval | 40.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 80.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 18% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 75.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.3% | — |
| BALROG | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1207 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,478 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#28), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 76.4% | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 75% | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.2% | 5.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.96 | 141.92 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.4% | — |
| CritPt | 6.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| ForecastBench | 61.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 48.8 (#50), o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.4% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 37.6% | 9.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67% | — |
| ProofBench | 20% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 55.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 18.8% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 64.3 (#15), o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | 8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1475 | 1362 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 90.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#1), o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | 84% | 80% |
| VPCT | 91% | 37% |
| LMArena Document | 1434 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 57.1 (#14), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1492 | 1343 |
| LMArena German | 1517 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1513 | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | 1449 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1468 | 1345 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 76.4 (#42), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1458 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| IFEval | 87.7% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#75), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1472 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| CL-bench | 15.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 66.6 (#34), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1525 | — |
| WildBench | 85.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Pro better than o1?
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3 Pro or o1 better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.1 versus 45.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Pro and o1 share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Pro has 67 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.