Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-4.1 nano
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Pro scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-4.1 nano in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 52.5 to 8.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 75% for Gemini 3 Pro and 0% for GPT-4.1 nano.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 54.8 | 27.9 |
| Released | 2025-11-18 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 67 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 51.6 (#39), GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 69.9% | 19% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1306 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.9% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 74.2% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 8.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.7% | — |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| GSO | 18.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,177 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.83 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 40.6 (#23), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.5% | 33% |
| Terminal-Bench | 69.4% | — |
| GDPval | 40.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 80.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 18% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 75.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.3% | — |
| BALROG | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1207 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 71% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,478 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#31), GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 31.1% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.1% | 33.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 75% | 0% |
| CritPt | 6.9% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1480 | 1286 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.92 | 129.62 |
| SimpleBench | 76.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.2% | — |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| ForecastBench | 61.2 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 49.9 (#59), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.4% | 28.9% |
| Omni-MATH | 55.5% | 36.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1476 | 1274 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 37.6% | 1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67% | — |
| ProofBench | 20% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 18.8% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 64.4 (#16), GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% | 48.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 90.3% | 55% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 80.3% | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1475 | 1272 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.6% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 57.6 (#2), GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | 1063 |
| GeoBench | 84% | — |
| VPCT | 91% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1434 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#16), GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1523 | 1270 |
| LMArena German | 1515 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1510 | 1198 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 76.3 (#45), GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 87.7% | 84.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1458 | 1267 |
Long Context Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#79), GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1471 | 1283 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 25% |
| CL-bench | 15.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 66.4 (#35), GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1285 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1260 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1525 | 946 |
| WildBench | 85.9% | 81.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Pro better than GPT-4.1 nano?
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-4.1 nano better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Pro has 67 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 nano has 38.