Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 83.1% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | 785.17 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1457 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LMCA | 43.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1445 |
Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.