Model comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 41 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #25 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 41 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.5 leads 60.9 to 51.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Blueprint-Bench 2: 0% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 27.3% for Grok 4.5.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.5.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Grok 4.5 specifications
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index52.355.0
Released2025-12-172026-07-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M500K
Max output66K500K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$3$6
Results tracked5952

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena WebDev14391553
WeirdML61.6%46.4%
LMArena Coding14601474
ALE-Bench1,3671,309
SWE-bench Verified75.4%—
DeepSWE—53.8%
FrontierCode—42.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
SWE-bench Multilingual72.7%—
SciCode—54.1%
GSO9.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.5 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
τ²-bench Banking27.3%47.9%
GDP.pdf10%14%
LMArena Search11981213
Vending-Bench 23,6353,887
Terminal-Bench64.3%—
APEX-Agents—56.2%
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Retail76.8%—
τ²-bench Telecom91.2%—
DeepResearch Bench49.8%—
PostTrainBench—23.4%
BALROG48.1%—
GBAEval—65.4%

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
ARC-AGI-233.6%52.6%
SimpleBench61.1%70%
NYT Connections (extended)83.1%79.9%
ARC-AGI-184.7%87.2%
Chess Puzzles40%36%
LMArena Hard Prompts14651462
DTBench89.1%96.5%
LMCA43.1%45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index151.8153.92
Kagi LLM Benchmark—83.5%
CritPt—15.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
Surface Evolver Bench—74.4%
ForecastBench58.5—

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%24.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%97.8%
ProofBench15%31%
LMArena Math14731459
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)35.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
GPQA Diamond89.4%93.4%
SimpleQA Verified66.8%48.3%
LMArena Expert14621466
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.5%—

Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena Vision12851288
Blueprint-Bench 20%27.3%
LMArena Document14131452
GeoBench88%—
VPCT72.6%—
Furniture Assembly—22.5%

Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena Non-English14581440
LMArena Chinese15111496
LMArena French14771456
LMArena German14971446
LMArena Japanese14891428
LMArena Korean14431404
LMArena Russian14801448
LMArena Spanish14691450

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena Instruction Following14371446

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena Longer Query14521463

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.5
LMArena Text14661448
LMArena Creative Writing14571442
LMArena Multi-Turn14711456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Grok 4.5?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 lists at $2 and $6.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 50.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Grok 4.5 share?

41 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper