Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GPT-4.1 nano
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-4.1 nano in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 84.7% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 0% for GPT-4.1 nano.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 27.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.5 (#35), GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 61.6% | 19% |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1306 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 8.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.6 (#27), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 33% |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#35), GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1286 |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 52.5% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.83 | 129.62 |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 33.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.4 (#42), GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 28.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1472 | 1274 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | 1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#30), GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 48.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | 6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1272 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 55% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.3 (#15), GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | 1063 |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.9 (#26), GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1510 | 1270 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1488 | 1199 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | 1478 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.8 (#52), GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1267 |
| IFEval | — | 84.3% |
Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#63), GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1283 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 25% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.6 (#44), GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1285 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 946 |
| WildBench | — | 81.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than GPT-4.1 nano?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-4.1 nano?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-4.1 nano better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.5 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GPT-4.1 nano share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 nano has 38.