Model comparison
Gemini 3 Deep Think vs Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#64); Gemini 3 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3 Deep Think scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.8 27B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Deep Think leads 70.8 to 31.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 25.7% for Gemini 3 Deep Think and 5.4% for Qwen3.8 27B.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 58.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-12 | 2026-08-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.99 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Deep Think leads
Gemini 3 Deep Think: 70.8 (#11), Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 25.7% | 5.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1459 |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1453 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1482 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1270 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1504 |
| LMArena French | — | 1468 |
| LMArena German | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1444 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1436 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1448 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1382 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1443 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Deep Think better than Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#64); Gemini 3 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Deep Think and Qwen3.8 27B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3 Deep Think has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.