Model comparison
Gemini 3 Deep Think vs GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); Gemini 3 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3 Deep Think scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.6 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Deep Think leads 70.2 to 23.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 25.7% for Gemini 3 Deep Think and 1.1% for GLM-4.6.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-12 | 2025-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1340 |
| SciCode | — | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1449 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Deep Think leads
Gemini 3 Deep Think: 70.2 (#14), GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 25.7% | 1.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1499 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1436 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1410 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3 Deep Think: —, GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Deep Think | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Deep Think better than GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); Gemini 3 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Deep Think and GLM-4.6 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3 Deep Think has 3 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.