Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 3.2 11B

Gemini 3.8 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#13); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

59.5

Rank #13 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

31.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 11B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 40.9 to 23.8.
  • Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 3.2 11B specifications
Gemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index59.531.6
Released2026-09-022024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.4 (#17), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
CursorBench39.6%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
LMArena Coding1512—
ALE-Bench1,270—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.3 (#22), Llama 3.2 11B: 27.0

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
APEX-Agents64.3%—
BALROG—16.8%
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 64.7 (#13), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1506—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.13—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.2 (#22), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—
LMArena Math1528—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.9 (#2), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—
LMArena Expert1529—
MMLU—56.5%

Multimodal Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.9 (#33), Llama 3.2 11B: 23.8

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Vision1312966
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 57.9 (#5), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Non-English1486—
LMArena Chinese1547—
LMArena French1502—
LMArena German1470—
LMArena Japanese1505—
LMArena Korean1479—
LMArena Russian1507—
LMArena Spanish1492—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.2 (#11), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Instruction Following1489—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.2 (#23), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Longer Query1506—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.1 (#16), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Text1494—
LMArena Creative Writing1485—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—
LMArena Multi-Turn1503—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Llama 3.2 11B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#13); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 3.2 11B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper