Model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 25.0.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | — |
| Results tracked | 50 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1270 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| SciCode | 56.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1264 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| DTBench | 95.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | — |
Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1274 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | — |
| LMArena German | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1245 |
Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.