Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Ring-2.6-1T Ant Group (inclusionAI)

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 26.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 59.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
  • Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
ProviderGoogleAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index59.836.9
Released2026-08-132026-05-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
SciCode59.8%42.4%
ALE-Bench904.3432.57
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
LMArena Coding1497—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
CritPt14.3%3.7%
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper