Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 46.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #68 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.6 to 37.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 84.6% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 42.4% for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.99 / $1.49 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.846.0
Released2026-08-132026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.99
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$1.49
Results tracked4431

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena WebDev15921593
SciCode59.8%46.6%
LMArena Coding14971482
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents67.8%47.5%
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
ARC-AGI-284.6%42.4%
NYT Connections (extended)94%54.5%
ARC-AGI-195.5%87.5%
CritPt14.3%5.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941460
DTBench96.8%88%
LMCA50.4%41.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27149.38
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
Surface Evolver Bench—45%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
ProofBench58%16%
LMArena Math15071456
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert15081482
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Qwen3.8 27B leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision13161271
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English14841430
LMArena Chinese15481504
LMArena French15051465
LMArena German14981438
LMArena Japanese15121384
LMArena Korean14831393
LMArena Russian15161415
LMArena Spanish15031448

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following14831439

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query14921450

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text14861441
LMArena Creative Writing14901384
EQ-Bench Creative Writing17231671
LMArena Multi-Turn14891441

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 46.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.99 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 50.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper