Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 47.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 29.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 94% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 60.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.847.5
Released2026-08-132026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$3
Results tracked4437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev15921461
SciCode59.8%40.7%
LMArena Coding14971467
ALE-Bench904.3670.15
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
FrontierSWE20.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)94%60.3%
CritPt14.3%2.9%
Chess Puzzles47%17%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941449
Mystery Game Puzzles37%12%
DTBench96.8%81.9%
LMCA50.4%33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27147.65
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Thematic Generalization—59.5%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%93.3%
LMArena Math15071450
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond94.8%88.4%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%44.1%
LMArena Expert15081454

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English14841424
LMArena Chinese15481477
LMArena French15051455
LMArena German14981452
LMArena Japanese15121389
LMArena Korean14831379
LMArena Russian15161434
LMArena Spanish15031432

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14831425

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14921439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text14861437
LMArena Creative Writing14901404
LMArena Multi-Turn14891438
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 47.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper