Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.9

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 24.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 71.6% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 35.1% for Qwen3.6 27B.
  • Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 27B specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.841.9
Released2026-08-132026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$3.60
Results tracked4411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
SciCode59.8%37.3%
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
LMArena Coding1499—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
CritPt14.3%0.9%
Chess Puzzles47%22%
Mystery Game Puzzles37%7%
DTBench96.8%78.1%
LMCA50.4%34.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72146.47
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1497—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%35.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%91.1%
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1511—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond94.8%85.9%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1553—
LMArena French1512—
LMArena German1485—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1486—
LMArena Russian1519—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
LMArena Instruction Following1486—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
LMArena Longer Query1493—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 27B
LMArena Text1487—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
EQ-Bench 4—1026
LMArena Multi-Turn1495—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 27B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper