Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

44.7

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 29.6.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.844.7
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14991488
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14971483
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math15111473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert15081489
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14851465
LMArena Chinese15531534
LMArena French15121483
LMArena German14851487
LMArena Japanese15061497
LMArena Korean14861438
LMArena Russian15191472
LMArena Spanish15071470

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14861467

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14931477

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14871471
LMArena Creative Writing14901464
LMArena Multi-Turn14951478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper