Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3-1.7B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.6 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.826.6
Released2026-08-132025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked444

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles47%0%
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond94.8%38%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper