Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen2.5-Max

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 25.6.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.840.7
Released2026-08-132025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14971359
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LiveBench Coding—64.4%
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen2.5-Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14941360
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27132.53
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LMCA50.4%—
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math15071369
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert15081337
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
Confabulations—21.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen2.5-Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English14841352
LMArena Chinese15481382
LMArena French15051396
LMArena German14981350
LMArena Japanese15121300
LMArena Korean14831304
LMArena Russian15161353
LMArena Spanish15031377

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following14831335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query14921358

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14861367
LMArena Creative Writing14901339
LMArena Multi-Turn14891364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen2.5-Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper