Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.7

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.5 to 15.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 7.4% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.829.7
Released2026-08-132024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$2.80
Results tracked447

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45%
LMArena Coding1499—
BigCodeBench Complete—52.3%
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
Chess Puzzles47%0%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72128.52
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1497—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%7.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1511—
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond94.8%46.1%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1553—
LMArena French1512—
LMArena German1485—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1486—
LMArena Russian1519—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1486—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1493—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1487—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1495—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper