Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen1.5-72B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.7 to 11.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.
  • Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.830.8
Released2026-08-132024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding14971165
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
ALE-Bench904.3—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen1.5-72B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14941148
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math15071164
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond94.8%28.8%
LMArena Expert15081136
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen1.5-72B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English14841135
LMArena Chinese15481186
LMArena French15051159
LMArena German14981084
LMArena Japanese15121061
LMArena Korean14831050
LMArena Russian15161104
LMArena Spanish15031110

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following14831141

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query14921157

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text14861166
LMArena Creative Writing14901137
LMArena Multi-Turn14891160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen1.5-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper