Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen1.5-32B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.8 to 13.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
  • Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.830.0
Released2026-08-132024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding14991155
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14971131
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math15111155
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond94.8%30.7%
LMArena Expert15081126
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
MMLU—74.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English14851106
LMArena Chinese15531176
LMArena French15121100
LMArena German14851058
LMArena Japanese15061027
LMArena Korean14861007
LMArena Russian15191073
LMArena Spanish15071089

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14861116

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query14931146

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text14871137
LMArena Creative Writing14901083
LMArena Multi-Turn14951140
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper